$90,000 in Pittsburgh ≈ $105,586 in Seattle
$105,586
Purchasing-power equivalent using BEA RPP 2024 (94.7 → 111.1). BLS OEWS May 2025 wages on linked pages.
Prices in Seattle run +17.3% vs Pittsburgh for equal purchasing power at this salary level.
Same job, both metros
- Chief Executives in Pittsburgh Chief Executives in Seattle
- Physicians, All Other in Pittsburgh Physicians, All Other in Seattle
- Computer and Information Systems Managers in Pittsburgh Computer and Information Systems Managers in Seattle
- Architectural and Engineering Managers in Pittsburgh Architectural and Engineering Managers in Seattle
- Financial Managers in Pittsburgh Financial Managers in Seattle
- Pittsburgh RPP
- 94.7
- Seattle RPP
- 111.1
- Price gap
- +17.3%
- Base salary
- $90,000
Prices in Seattle run +17.3% versus Pittsburgh on BEA all-items RPP (2024), so overall price levels are higher at the destination. A $90,000 paycheck in Pittsburgh maps to about $105,586 in Seattle for equal purchasing power.
Salary needed in Seattle
| In Pittsburgh | In Seattle |
|---|---|
| $60,000 | $70,391 |
| $90,000 | $105,586 |
| $150,000 | $175,977 |
Equivalent = origin salary × (111.1 ÷ 94.7). Adjust the base with the slider above.
Price level components
| Component | Pittsburgh | Seattle | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| All items | 94.7 | 111.1 | 100 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 104.0 | 100 |
| Housing (rents) | 72.0 | 151.3 | 100 |
| Other services | 97.7 | 106.8 | 100 |
BEA Regional Price Parities 2024, US = 100. Housing is rents; utilities omitted in this view.
Wages in both metros
| Occupation | Pittsburgh | Seattle | Dest. middle half | Dest. OEWS emp. | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Executives | $216,060 | $370,000 | $260,990 to $481,180 | 2,060 | +71.2% |
| Physicians, All Other | $187,680 | $330,560 | $248,540 to $383,880 | 3,590 | +76.1% |
| Computer and Information Systems Managers | $159,090 | $214,680 | $171,550 to $299,560 | 13,170 | +34.9% |
| Architectural and Engineering Managers | $161,720 | $204,340 | $171,360 to $219,300 | 4,390 | +26.4% |
| Financial Managers | $136,330 | $185,550 | $149,530 to $228,360 | 8,500 | +36.1% |
| Sales Managers | $125,060 | $184,320 | $143,240 to $254,290 | 6,620 | +47.4% |
| Marketing Managers | $127,590 | $175,850 | $129,990 to $230,740 | 6,720 | +37.8% |
| Human Resources Managers | $131,690 | $171,360 | $136,590 to $219,000 | 3,200 | +30.1% |
BLS OEWS May 2025 metro medians where published for both CBSAs. Employment is OEWS published employment, not job openings.
Find Chief Executives jobs in Seattle
See current openings for Chief Executives in Seattle.
Opens external site · PayByCity is not affiliated with Indeed or LinkedIn · Listings not verified by us
FAQ
- What salary do I need in Seattle to match $90,000 in Pittsburgh?
- About $105,586, based on BEA Regional Price Parities (2024) of 94.7 and 111.1. Formula: salary × (RPP_destination / RPP_origin). Not financial advice.
- What do goods, housing, and other RPP components mean?
- BEA publishes component indexes alongside all-items RPP. Goods covers merchandise prices; housing (rents) covers rents; other services covers remaining services. All are indexed to US = 100 for the same vintage year.
- How do OEWS wages relate to this comparison?
- BLS OEWS (May 2025) publishes occupation medians by metro. The wage bridge shows jobs with published medians in both metros, plus middle-half bands and OEWS employment where available. RPP adjusts purchasing power; OEWS reports pay.
- Does this include taxes or benefits?
- No. PayByCity does not model income taxes, childcare, healthcare premiums, or leave. Use the figures as a price-level starting point, not a take-home or total-rewards calculator.
What this covers
Includes
- BEA Regional Price Parities (all items, goods, housing rents, other services)
- BLS OEWS median wages, percentile bands, and employment where published
- Purchasing-power math: salary × (destination RPP ÷ origin RPP)
Does not include
- Federal, state, or local income taxes
- Childcare, healthcare premiums, or leave benefits
- Job openings. OEWS employment is a published stock estimate, not hiring demand
See methodology and disclaimer.